DOGE Fraud May be Sued for Under the Tucker Act/FTCA at Up to $10,000 without US Govt Consent by Recession's Clause

This type of case is a perfect example of why being within the sovereign caveat is so important. The following is from our form 95 administrative claim to help demonstrate:

"Fraud being reported by DOGE et al may be preponderated under Federeal Rules of Evidence through clause of economic recession (with total debt being over half of total assets) moreso than not as having depraved Claimant financially at an amount which may be seen as the maximum amount allowed to be claimed without the consent of the United States due to such lack of directive oversight in recession. That amount being claimed is $10,000 under the Tucker Act and FTCA."

Everyone just saw the fur fly at DOGE and all of the fraud that was uncovered, and even the trillions that could not be traced.

Well, there was that day when they started reducing all of their findings after getting so excited, and anyone with legal experience would know that that was likely when they were hit with and avalanche of personal injury claims.

Below is a copy of our claim via the standard form 95, though where we differ is through civilian sovereign immunity, with the other articles and our book being very acute towards the logic behind modern sovereign immunity as applied to secession's superluminal refederation.

If we could be watching those other claims, we could bet that the courts are going to throw out anyone not proving civilian sovereign caveat via claiming government sovereign immunity then, because a citizen in recession cannot claim against themselves by having shown to have most likely caused that to themselves for not being progressive, and with secession's superluminal mechanism shown to be the shortest action, pf.

Furthermore, the public can follow cases like these to see just who's who behind our courts' benches, because the logic is simply unable to be argued with...even the untraceable amounts that were found in the Treasury may be preponderated in favor of soverignty as moreso likely than not to have been depraving. One can see that perhaps there could be a bit more able to be claimed, but one would have a hard time working around the federal code which states that the US has to consent to being sued, and with most torts being barred by the FTCA and left to the states over $10,000.

This particular type of case should make sense too from a federal perspective, in that a working government would have some way to check its own fraud without fail. As such, we can see how secession's claws spring out like a cats via such automatic governmental mechanics in order to harness recession's own energy towards secession's reorganization, for the next round!